Entry 10 - Where Are You Anchored?

The Social Judgement Theory looks into how one is able to have their perception of an idea moved by comparing it with current attitudes. 

Social Judgement is often metaphorized as an anchor. You have your view anchored on one side, and it is gradual process to move it to the other side. Just like an anchor is heavy, our biases prevent us from jumping from one extreme to another. This is a powerful tool in persuasion.

In the first frame of the above comic strip, Bill Waterson's Calvin has already made up his mind that he does not like the dish in front of his nose. His father tries to push him into the opposite perspective - "You'll love it"- and Calvin vehemently resists. Calvin is grounded in the idea that the food will be disgusting and, possibly, poisonous.

However, I recall another Calvin dinner comic, the only one where Calvin eats his mystery meal. His father tries to find a common ground with him. Calvin loves monsters so his father convinces him that if he eats the food, he will mutate into something cool. Suddenly the risk of an unpleasant taste pales in comparison to the thrill of becoming a mutant, and Calvin digs in.

That's a silly example, but it's an important theory to remember. When trying to convince someone to take a different stance on moral idea (like abortion), we cannot force them to just jump to the other side of the argument. We need to begin with the common ground (such as, babies are amazing creatures), and slowly move on from there.

So next time you're in a debate or having an ethical discussion, keep this theory in mind.

- L

Entry 9 - Converge Your Symbols

The faces of America's next reality TV stars:

"Hanna's Angels" Or "Desperate Best Friends"

Symbolic convergence can be described as "Two or more private symbol worlds inclined toward each other, come more closely together, or even overlap; group consciousness or cohesiveness."

My sister (A, also known as J) and best friend (M) and I have formed a group based on private symbols that draw us closer together. This theory is studied under the circumstances of making new friends, but I cannot recall a time when we were not close, because we have been together since we were babies. Even as a shy child, I don't remember having as much trouble making friends as I do now ( I wish it was the other way around, but even the quietest child is less ashamed of herself when she is young and unaware of judging eyes.) 

Our world has expanded through the years. Road trips and hours of playing with dolls and swimming and role playing have brought us close. And I believe that our personalities just "click." To the outside world, people see me blossom when I'm around M and A and are surprised to find me capable of anything clever and bold. But that's the real me. In our fantasy group, we are the embodiment of California; we are artists, we are models, we are nerds, we are heroines, we are mothers, we are sisters, we are free, and we are beautiful.

I find I only need a few close-knit relationships to survive, and I am happy to discover a relationship like that with my fiance. I know I will have someone to relate with every day of my life. Even still, I want to stay connected to my "LAM" group as much as possible because we have had such a large impact on each other's lives. It's hard to imagine being without them. I thank God for the communities He has given me. :)

- L

Entry 8 - Interactional View

Communication theorist, Paul Watzlawick 

looked "at dysfunctional patterns within families in order to gain insight into healthy communication.”

As the member of a family,  this theory resonates with me. Four different people living together under one roof for 18 plus years have to find a pattern of survival with each other. Often times, it can be unhealthy. As one of the family members struggles, the other members feel the painful tug. We are all connected.

The theory explains the roles family members play, and these roles are often switched around. Using my family as an example:

One with the problem - Lilia, Jo, Dad
Enabler - Dad, Lilia
Deny-er - Dad, Jo
Hero - Mom

Most of the time, Mom has to remain the hero and pulls the family back into balance. No wonder being a mother is a hard job! I deeply admire her for that.

At an early age, I discovered that, between my sister and I, there always had to be one of us in the "bad guy" role. When I was the rebellious kid, she was the obedient kid; when she was the misbehaved girl, I was the well-behaved girl. It was not until we were teenagers that this cycle subsided. Even as a child, I understood the reason to be jealousy. One of us does well and is praised, so the other feels inadequate and snatches her parent's attention in a negative, but effective, way. Lovely.

Through the years, God has taught each of us how handle one another in love and to operate as a healthier family unit. We still have loose ends, but I find that I have grown so accustomed to our dysfunctions that I find it easier to deal with temperamental people like us rather than with sensitive people. 

Entry 7 - Relational Dialectics

 As Calvin and Susie illustrate, every relationship undergoes some form of disagreement. For these two it happens often,  due to Calvin's girls-have-cooties-and-are-stupid attitude and Susie's nice-girl-pushed-to-pranking-the-annoying-boy responses. Yet despite their differences these two are often featured in Bill Watterson's comics. Why? Because their constant pull in opposing directions is what makes their unconventional friendship strong. And they create some good laughs!

One thing my fiance and I having difficulty agreeing on is what many other couples often debate on - finances! After being spoiled as a child, I am still in the process of learning the value of money, and I believe in occasional splurging as a treat (especially on clothes! Can't wear the same shirt for 5 months!), while he has always been tight-budgeted and still wears clothes from his middle school days.

However, we have found that our different views on finances help balance each other out and give us both a well-rounded perception. I have learned to pull the reigns on my spending and he has started to up his living standard (and his wardrobe count!) occasionally. We have also discovered that our arguments leave us with a stronger relationship after they have been resolved. With God's help, the opposite pulls between us end up pulling us closer together.

So whether it's teasing or finances, I hope each one of you remembers to look at the good that comes from the differences in your relationships.

Entry 6 - Processing Your Social Info

"Shoulda had a V8!"

"There, there."

"O hai :3"

I guess these could be called "first dates" for my fiance and I.
We met online December of 2009 on Facebook by recommendation of my sister who knew him as a Christian from deviantArt. We moved most of our conversing to MSN instant messaging and playing Super Smash Bros Brawl online. Yeah, our kind of story causes skepticism to some listeners, but the medium of how we met was not what made us fall in love - it was because of our personalities and God's evident hand upon our relationship. As I often say, "It's not where you are, it's who you are."

That is one reason why I decided to present the Social Information Processing Theory of Joseph Walther to my COM300 class (the other reason was I really wanted to use that Peter Tork clip from Monkee VS Machine!) As Walther claimed, opposed to popular CMC (Computer Mediated Communication) studies of the early 90s, the internet can be used for more than academics and work, but for relationships as well. His theory's name has an acronym that supports the main idea - SIP. Like sipping a drink through a straw takes longer than taking big gulps, such is the flow of information about someone when discovered online rather than in person. 

In our case, CMC was just what my fiance and I needed to start off.  First, we are both shy people who are often labeled as socially awkward because our introverted personalities leave us at a loss for in-the-moment words. Talk to us 30 minutes later and we know just what to say! But through writing, we are geniuses! Even before we met we both believed CMC opened the window to our souls. Second, I was sixteen going on seventeen ♫ and he had just turned 22. I had a year and a half of highschool to go and he was finishing his bachelor's degree. It would have been harder for us to wait to get engaged if our relationship was able to progress at an in-person pace, yet it was necessary for us to wait.Third, we lived in different states so even if we had by some miracle met in person our separation would have been hard without being able to chat or Skype (now we are blessed to live in the same state.)

We felt like using the SIP theory made us able to learn and appreciate all sides of our personalities. They all have a different flair in chat, in text, on webcam, over the phone, and in person, but they still are the same. We accessed different areas of our brains as we found ways to pick up emotional cues with or without non-verbals. Today Daniel and I  prefer in-person communication, but still enjoy taking an occasional trip down memory  lane online.

* Screenshots taken by Daniel and I of The Legend of Zelda's Link and Zelda on that wonderful Wii game, Super Smash Bros Brawl. Nintendo owns The Legend of Zelda, the Wii, and Super Smash Bros Brawl.